Flagship Event · 2026

Avinya 2026

An eco-innovate challenge by Prakriti Club, IIT Guwahati, run with Techniche — and home to the 1st event on Sustainable Innovation & Green Technologies.

#Avinya2026 #EcoInnovate #event
About Avinya event
Flagship Event · 2026

Avinya 2026 — Eco-Innovate Challenge

Our flagship eco-hackathon, run with Techniche, IIT Guwahati, and home to event 2026 — the event on Sustainable Innovation & Green Technologies held as part of Avinya. Open to students of every discipline at any institution.

#EcoInnovate #Sustainability #event #IITGuwahati

₹1,00,000

Total prize pool, including ₹65,000 in cash, plus branded goodies and tools.

2,252

Participants registered, verified against completed registration form and fee payment.

2–5 members

Per team. Any stream — engineering, science, design or management.

2 rounds

An online proposal round, then a 30 hour on-campus build sprint, extended by 6 hours.

How it ran

Round 1 — Online

Teams chose one problem statement from a curated set, built a solution around it, and submitted a structured presentation. Proposals were judged by a panel of experts on four criteria:

Solution Innovation — 30%
Technical Feasibility — 25%
Scalability & Practicality — 25%
Sustainability Impact — 20%

Round 2 — On Campus

Shortlisted teams were invited to the IIT Guwahati campus to present their prototypes live to an expert jury, then took on fresh problem statements from industry mentors in an intensive 30 hour sprint, which opened at 6:00 PM on 29 August and closed at 6:00 AM on 31 August after a 6 hour extension — 36 hours in total. Scored evenly between the two phases.

Phase 1 — 50%
Phase 2 — 50%
29 August — on the day
8:00 AM – 10:00 AM Inauguration
10:00 AM – 6:00 PM Preparation and rectifications on the Round 1 submissions
6:00 PM onwards Round 2 build sprint begins
Submission deadline — 6:00 AM, 31 August. Final deadline for the drive links of both the Round 1 and Round 2 submissions.

The judging panel

Proposals and prototypes were assessed by this panel of experts.

Dr. Saikat Sarma

Medical & Health Officer

Sonapur

Sanket Umap

Outreach Head

TIC, IIT Guwahati

Abhay Verma

Co-Founder

Universal Times Magazine

Student panelists

Overnight evaluation and judge communication during the 30 hour build sprint.

Because the build sprint ran without a break from 6:00 PM on 29 August to 6:00 AM on 31 August, evaluation could not be left to a single sitting at the end. These student panelists were stationed with the shortlisted teams through the night, tracked each submission against its published problem statement and the four scoring criteria, and resolved routine clarifications on the spot so that no team was ever left blocked waiting for a decision. Every problem statement was covered — PS 1 and PS 2 included — so that no track was left unevaluated and no submission went unscored. The same panelists acted as the single point of contact between the floor and the jury — carrying questions up to the judges and returning with scoring guidance — so that every team received the same information at the same time. This kept the overnight evaluation consistent, transparent and contestant friendly, without interrupting the judges’ own deliberation.

Niloy Dev

Student Panelist

M.Tech, Robotics & Artificial Intelligence
IIT Guwahati

Deepak Yadav

Student Panelist

5th Year PhD, Department of Chemistry
IIT Guwahati

Shubham Singh

Student Panelist

5th Year PhD, School of Energy Science & Engineering
IIT Guwahati

Mentors

Students of IIT Guwahati and engineers from its Technology Innovation Hub who mentored the participant teams across project and event management.

Niloy Dev

Project & Event Management

M.Tech in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence

Siddharth Das

Project & Event Management

M.Tech in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence

Anshula Das

Project & Event Management

M.Tech in Biomedical Engineering

Sudarshan Vikas Chaudhari

Project & Event Management

M.Tech, Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Poojan Chaniyara

Project Management

Project Staff, Bio-science and Bio-engineering

Nribarai Sankar

Project Management

PhD, Department of Physics

Prabhat Kumar Jha

Event Management

Department of Physics

Aishwarya

Event Management

M.Tech, Chemical Engineering

Dadi Gnana Sowparnika

Event Management

M.Tech, Chemical Engineering

Bhyri Swetha Vardhani

Project Management

M.Tech, Chemical Engineering

Shristy Sumon Gogoi

Event Management

M.Tech, Chemical Engineering

Priya Kemprai

Mentoring

Assistant Engineer, Technology Innovation Hub (IIT Guwahati)
priyakemp@tih.iitg.ac.in

Niloy Dev is listed in both groups, having mentored teams and also served as a student panelist.

The problem tracks

Nine problem statements were published across three tracks, and every one of them was evaluated. Each was assessed against the published problem statement it was set for and against the same four scoring criteria — PS 1 and PS 2 included. No problem statement was skipped, none was short-changed, and none was judged on a different standard from any other.

Track A

Software & Web

  • Peer-to-peer microgrid dashboard for community energy trading
  • Urban carbon footprint calculator for campus
  • Smart polyhouse management interface
Track B

Computational Modelling

  • Stationary solar concentrator design for residential water heating
  • Urban heat island mitigation simulation
Track C

Design & Systems Engineering

  • Hydrogen fuel retrofit roadmap for small-scale engines
  • Mechanical biogas flow & purification manifolds
  • Smart renewable energy without electronics
  • Decentralised smart waste-to-energy collection network

How submissions were evaluated

Every one of the 49 scored entries was assessed on the same evidence, by the same rubric, in both rounds — so the comparison between teams rests on what they actually submitted rather than on who presented it best. Alongside the rubric, the event’s Code of Conduct applied throughout: conduct was a process matter in its own right, handled separately from the score.

The presentation, actually read

The text and images were extracted from each submitted deck and read, rather than scored from a title slide or a thumbnail.

The demo video

Where a demo video was submitted, it was watched as part of the entry for both rounds.

The deployment, probed live

Claimed working links were requested over the network at scoring time. A link was credited only if it actually responded.

The code repository

The size of each public repository was recorded through the GitHub API, so the working claim and the code behind it could be compared.

Fit to the problem statement

Each entry was checked against the theme its problem statement was set for, so a polished but off-topic build could not outrank a focused one.

Candidate conduct

The Code of Conduct applied during evaluation, not only during the sprint. Other teams’ workspaces, code and accounts were off limits; work had to be a team’s own or properly attributed; and nobody could knowingly misrepresent the results, data or capability of a submission. Conduct was dealt with under the Code of Conduct as a separate matter from the score.

One fixed rule set

Deductions for placeholder entries, near-empty decks and unusable links were applied from a single published rule set, in the same way to every entry — never case by case.

Timeline

31 JUL 2026

Problem statements launched

Registration and the proposal round open on Unstop.

20 AUG 2026

Round 1 submissions close

Proposal deadline, 11:59 PM IST.

21 AUG 2026

Shortlist announced

Selection letters issued to qualifying teams.

29–31 AUG 2026

Round 2 — on-campus sprint & showcase

30 hour build alongside Techniche, opening 6:00 PM on 29 August and closing 6:00 AM on 31 August after a further 6 hour extension.

31 AUG – 01 SEPT 2026

event — oral presentations

Selected teams delivered their oral presentations at the event across 31 August and 1 September.

11 OCT 2026

Conference day & rescheduled presentations

The event 2026 conference day at IIT Guwahati — distinguished talks in the morning, and the rescheduled team presentations in the afternoon.

18 OCT 2026

Avinya 2026 concludes — final result publication

Poster presentations and the announcement of the event results, and the concluding event of Avinya 2026. The final result of Avinya 2026 is published on 18 October 2026, to every team at the same time, through the same channel.

Verify your certificate

Every participation certificate carries a scannable Verify code carrying a digital signature. Anyone can check a certificate independently — the code is validated against the club's issued record, so a forged or altered certificate is rejected.

Official Unstop listing Techniche page

Registration figures are as reported by the Unstop listing, which counts live and varies slightly between visits. Deadlines and the problem-statement set follow the official Avinya 2026 poster.

Conference · Part of Avinya

event 2026

“Innovating Sustainability. Empowering Tomorrow.”

Temporarily unavailable

The event 2026 conference details are temporarily unavailable due to administrative reasons.

Return to Prakriti Club homepage.

Authenticity

Verify a Certificate

Every Avinya 2026 certificate carries a signed Verify code. It is not a decoration — it is a digital signature that only the club can produce, checked against the club's own record of what it issued.

A genuine certificate passes three independent checks: its contents are unaltered, its signature is the club's, and its number appears in the issued register. A forged or edited certificate fails.

Open the verifier

The verifier runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you paste is uploaded, and it works with no internet connection.

Example of the signed Verify QR code printed on an Avinya 2026 certificate

An example Verify code

Every certificate has its own code, unique to that holder and signed by the club.